Law and Human Right

Justice Secretary Robert Buckland denies Boris Johnson set to opt out of major human rights laws

Justice Secretary Robert Buckland has denied Boris Johnson is set to opt out of the European Convention on Human Rights.

Mr Buckland said leaving the Convention would be “wholly wrong” and that the UK Government should instead focus on streamlining its domestic laws.

It comes despite reports the Prime Minister is planning to withdraw from major parts of European human rights laws in a bid to ease migrant deportation cases.


But speaking on Sunday, the Justice Secretary batted down these suggestions.

Boris Johnson was said to have been planning to withdraw from major parts of European human rights laws (REUTERS)

The European Convention on Human Rights, a landmark treaty that was drawn up in the aftermath of the Second World War, aims to protect the civil and political rights of the continent’s citizens.

Mr

Read More

European Court of Human Rights’ president degrades court with Turkish award

Because Europe prides itself on institutions that uphold and promote international law, the European Court of Human Rights is perhaps the most popular symbol of the European approach toward statecraft. As the Strasburg-based court was established under the aegis of Council of Europe, its jurisdiction is far broader than even the European Union. Today, 47 states are members, 20 more countries than have joined the European Union.



Recep Tayyip Erdogan wearing a suit and tie


© Provided by Washington Examiner


Alas, as often happens with human rights institutions, ego, arrogance, and an embrace of moral equivalence combines to erode their standing and betray the principles for which they stand. Former Ireland President Mary Robinson, for example, made a mockery of the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights when she sponsored the Orwellian “World Conference against Racism, Racial Discrimination, Xenophobia and Related Intolerance.” A decade ago, Robert Bernstein took to the pages of the New York

Read More

Boris Johnson ‘plans to opt out of human rights laws’ amid Brexit row

Boris Johnson is planning to opt out of parts of the Human Rights Act, according to reports.

The prime minister is said be considering ways to prevent the legislation being used to stop deportations of asylum seekers and prosecutions of British soldiers.

A review of human rights laws has been carried out across Whitehall and its findings will be announced “in the coming weeks”, the Daily Telegraph reported.

The move comes after Mr Johnson sparked fury in Europe with the Internal Market Bill to override part of the Brexit deal he signed in October.

Ministers have admitted that it would break international law but the prime minister claims it is necessary to prevent the EU  “carving up our country”.

However he is facing mounting criticism from across the political spectrum, including rebel Tory MPs and former prime ministers John Major and Tony Blair.

Brussels wants the UK to

Read More

Fury at Boris Johnson’s plan to have ‘opt-outs from human rights laws’

Boris Johnson has sparked fury after it emerged he is plotting “opt-outs” from human rights laws in certain situations after Brexit.

The Prime Minister is looking at changing the law to make it easier to deport migrants or asylum seekers, according to the Sunday Telegraph.

Changing the law could also make it harder to bring legal action against British troops overseas.

The changes would reportedly be made to the Human Rights Act, which was passed in 1998 to apply the European Convention on Human Rights in UK law.

The Convention is a landmark treaty that drawn up after the Second World War which protects freedom from torture, family life, protection from discrimination and the right to a fair trial.

While the Tories today insisted they would not abandon the Convention, they have been vowing to reform the Act since before the general election.

Read More

Personal data transfer and human rights | Feature

Ibrahim hasan

In July, Schrems II (case C-311/18) saw the European Court of Justice rule that the ‘Privacy Shield’ was invalid. This is a framework agreed between the UK and US to allow for the free flow of personal data across the Atlantic in a way which was, at the time, believed to be compliant with EU data protection law. In its ruling the ECJ was concerned about US authorities’ wide-ranging powers to access the personal data of EU residents and the impact on privacy.

In April, part 3 of the Data Protection Act 2018 (DPA) was also involved in a case about the transfer of personal data to the US. Part 3 is similar to GDPR but only regulates the processing of personal data for law enforcement purposes by competent authorities, which include (among others) government departments and the police.

Elgizouli (Appellant) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent)

Read More

Boris Johnson set to opt out of human rights laws



FILE - In this Wednesday, Sept. 9, 2020 file photo, Britain's Prime Minister Boris Johnson leaves Downing Street to attend the weekly session of Prime Ministers Questions in Parliament in London. British Prime Minister Boris Johnson has strongly defended his controversial plan to override sections of the Brexit deal that he negotiated with the European Union, arguing that the bloc has an “extreme” interpretation of the treaty that could jeopardize the future of the U.K. In a column Saturday, Sept. 12, 2020 in The Daily Telegraph, Johnson said the Internal Market Bill is required to end EU threats to impose a “blockade” in the Irish Sea that he argues could “carve up our country.”  (AP Photo/Kirsty Wigglesworth, file)


© ASSOCIATED PRESS
FILE – In this Wednesday, Sept. 9, 2020 file photo, Britain’s Prime Minister Boris Johnson leaves Downing Street to attend the weekly session of Prime Ministers Questions in Parliament in London. British Prime Minister Boris Johnson has strongly defended his controversial plan to override sections of the Brexit deal that he negotiated with the European Union, arguing that the bloc has an “extreme” interpretation of the treaty that could jeopardize the future of the U.K. In a column Saturday, Sept. 12, 2020 in The Daily Telegraph, Johnson said the Internal Market Bill is required to end EU threats to impose a “blockade” in the Irish Sea that he argues could “carve up our country.” (AP Photo/Kirsty Wigglesworth, file)

Britain is preparing to opt out of major parts of European human rights laws, risking an explosive new row with the EU.

Boris Johnson’s aides and ministers are drawing

Read More

Boris Johnson to opt out of major European human rights laws

Boris Johnson looks set to withdraw from significant European human rights laws in a move which could make it easier to deport migrants and more difficult to sue British soldiers. 

Ministers are considering opt-outs from the Human Rights Act (HRA) in areas the Government believes European judges have ‘overreached,’ according to the Sunday Telegraph.

The legislation was signed into British law in November 1998 to incorporate rights set out in the European Convention on Human Rights.   

An opt-out could prevent a significant number of migrants and asylum seekers from using the legislation to avoid deportation from the UK.  

The move could also protect British soldiers from claims against their overseas activities, it was reported.

It is understood details of a formal review will be announced in the coming weeks.

Boris Johnson looks set to opt out of major European human rights laws which could make it easier to deport migrants

Read More

Boris to opt-out of major European human rights laws making it easier to deport migrants, harder to sue soldiers

Boris to opt-out of major European human rights laws making it easier to deport migrants, harder to sue soldiers

Boris Johnson looks set to withdraw from significant European human rights laws in a move which could make it easier to deport migrants and more difficult to sue British soldiers.

Ministers are considering opt-outs from the Human Rights Act (HRA) in areas the Government believes European judges have ‘overreached,’ according to the Sunday Telegraph.

The legislation was signed into British law in November 1998 to incorporate rights set out in the European Convention on Human Rights.

The Tory manifesto pledged to ‘update’ the HRA after Brexit, but the move is contentious with Brussels and negotiators have expressed concern over the UK’s commitment to the European Convention on Human Rights.

It comes amid a growing crisis over the number of migrants making treacherous journeys across the English Channel from northern France.

An opt-out could prevent a significant number of migrants and asylum seekers from using the legislation to avoid deportation from

Read More

U of T law school under fire for opting not to hire human-rights scholar after pressure from sitting judge

The University of Toronto’s St. George campus photographed on May 20, 2020.

Fred Lum/The Globe and Mail

The University of Toronto’s law school is facing international and internal criticism, accused of caving in to pressure from a sitting federal judge not to hire a human-rights director because of her scholarship on Israel’s occupation of the Palestinian territories.

The law school has been attempting to fill the job of director of its International Human Rights Law Program, which has been vacant for a year. A hiring committee recommended Valentina Azarova, a published scholar with academic experience in several countries, including Germany, Britain and at Al-Quds University in East Jerusalem. An online biographical note says she is associate editor of the Oxford Reports on International Human Rights Law and United Nations Treaty Bodies.

In an e-mail to law dean Edward Iacobucci on Sept. 12, two former directors of the program allege that

Read More

Access to justice as a human right during pandemic

The global concern during the current pandemic is human rights and their implementation. In this backdrop, the Lawyers and Jurists Foundation organised Digital Dialogue-9 on 11 September, 2020 about access to justice as human rights during pandemic.

The dialogue was commenced by Professor Dr. Mizanur Rahman, Former Chairman, National Human Rights Commission Bangladesh and Professor, Department of Law, Dhaka University. He outlined the concept of access to justice. Further in global perspective, he enunciated and agreed that the access to justice is deemed as both as a basic human right and means to preserve other universally recognised human rights.

Moreover, he urged how the access to justice as a human right promotes the legal systems in Bangladesh. He opined that the criminal justice system is an aggregate of various role players such as the police, the courts, lawyers and the prisons. All these are interrelated and are needed for the

Read More